Skip to main content

Freedom is Endangered

Of the two major political parties, the Republican Party is the one closest to advocating for freedom from government control. Democrats consistently support higher taxes and more regulations to permit government officials to control our lives. They support political (group) decision making over empowering individuals to make their own decisions. We have come to expect Democrats to support increasing the power of government at the expense of individual freedom.

It is sad and dangerous, though, when Republicans support government power over individual freedom. If the Republican Party is not strong in its stand for freedom and individual rights against the power of government, then our Republic is in danger of deteriorating into a (we hope benevolent) despotism because people distrust or forbid individuals to run their own lives make their own decisions.

Over the past few years, I have encountered Republicans who believe these things:
  1. The food school children eat should be controlled by government to avoid obesity on the grounds that taxpayers will have to pay for health care issues caused by obesity and poor nutrition.
  2. Parents are less qualified than government officials to determine how their children should be educated and which schools they should attend.
  3. Freedom of the press should be restricted for businesses printing a message considered offensive.
  4. Private businesses should be forced to allow their employees to not perform assigned tasks if they morally object to them without any financial consequence to the employee or compensation to the employer.
This is why those beliefs threaten freedom:
  1. This implies that the government owns people as chattel instead of people being free. The solution to this problem is to eliminate taxpayer funded health care and allow individuals to take care of themselves and encourage private charities to take care of those who can't. Government should be a health care provider of last resort. Republicans (especially legislators) who don't get that are buying into a Socialist agenda instead of trying to combat Socialism and restore freedom.
  2. Opposition to school vouchers, for example, on the grounds that government officials are better able to decide how a child should be educated than the parents means that we don't trust private citizens to be free. First, it does not make sense that parents would not be able to better determine what is best for their children more effectively than government officials who probably won't even know or love the child even a fraction as much as the parents. More importantly, though, if parents are not competent enough to decide how their children should be educated, how will they be deemed intelligent enough to select the government officials in charge of their children's education? This contempt for individual decision making and respect for government decision making is a long term prescription for despotism.
  3. Promoting laws against speech or writing against a group supported by Republicans undermines the entire moral principle used to object to "hate speech" rules and other provisions used to restrict freedom of expression against those supported by liberals. Freedom means people are free to say stupid and offensive things. It also means we are free to ignore those people and not support them either morally or financially. Republicans passing laws to prohibit expression instead of exercising their rights to either ignore or counter that expression accepts the despotic notion pushed by liberals that there is "acceptable" and "unacceptable" speech and that government, rather than individuals exercising their own judgment independently, should make those decisions.
  4. Supporting special rights for a special class of people Republicans like accepts that the liberal notion that government should interfere in the private sector to regulate the employer/employee relationship instead of allowing employers and employees to negotiate mutually acceptable arrangements. Accepting the idea that employees are powerless against employers and cannot find another job more suited to their lifestyle and personal preferences is to accept the notion that employees are not free, independent, self determining people. When liberals do this, conservatives generally object. If conservatives do it, then they lose the moral justification for objecting when liberals do it. This puts employees and employers in a role of being vassals with special privileges and limitations granted by the state instead of independent, free agents who can make their own decisions about how to earn a living or run a business. As when liberals do these things, conservatives erode freedom, which is important to generally protecting all of our rights, when they push a particular agenda that restricts freedom for a "good" cause.
We know that Democrats do not accept the notion of individual freedom. They accept that favored classes should be free to use the resources of less favored classes without freely given consent. That is, they accept freedom for themselves at the expense of others who do not agree with them. The only other major political party is the Republican Party.

If the Republican Party and Republican elected officials will not firmly stand for freedom, then the existence of the United States as a free society is in serious danger.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

TSA Employees Finally Getting Paid What They are Worth

The government shutdown has caused TSA employees to not get paid. Considering that they provide negative overall value to the nation and travelers, they are still technically getting over paid. However, getting them to pay travelers is not feasible. They generally provide very little protection for the inconvenience and humiliation they inflict on travelers. The real security in an airplane cabin is a secure cockpit and passengers who will fight hijackers to the death now that we know what they are up to. I'm also still waiting to hear a good explanation of why banning pocket knives from aircraft and other great TSA ideas enhances our security. Basic TSA-Pre screening without those ridiculously expensive scanners (also known as what was done before 9-11) is also perfectly adequate. The Huffington Post has a whiny article about the TSA employees not getting paid. Of course, all government employees including those not actually showing up for work will get back pay once the approp

CPS Reform Proposal

CPS Reform Proposal Purpose: Improvement in accountability and cost effectiveness of CPS for the benefit of the public is the primary goal of this proposal. It seeks to allow this by privatizing the management of the CPS functions and allowing direct voter input for selecting the amount of services that will be provided by each contracting organization. By requiring voters to vote for percentages of business to go to each contractor, better contractor performance will result in more state business going to the superior contractors. By requiring each voter to vote for at least two contractors, we still ensure that other contractors will be in place to provide cost and quality competition. Time Frames: CPS will contract all routine case management work to 3-5 qualified independent organizations on a bi-annual basis corresponding to the election cycle for state legislators. Investigation work will also be contracted out to 3-5 qualified independent organizations on a bi-annual basis.

GOP Must Make Stand for Election Integrity

 The Presidential election will officially be over when the January 6, 2021 session of Congress to count electoral votes is concluded. Many key Republican elected officials have been a major disappointment in this election cycle. This includes legislators, governors, and secretaries of state. Republican legislatures in Arizona, Georgia, Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Wisconsin failed to take strong action to appoint the Trump/Pence slate of electors and negate the appointment of Biden/Harris electors on the grounds of unlawfully implemented voting regulations or outright election fraud. Any honest count of the legitimate votes in those states would have given the election to Trump in every one of them. Other elected officials such as Governor Doug Ducey of Arizona, Governor Brian Kemp of Georgia, and Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger of Georgia presided over, tolerated, and certified Democrats stealing the presidential election right under their noses. President Trump failed to h