Skip to main content

Arizonans are Taxed Enough

This is a response to this opinion piece in the Jewish News of Greater Phoenix.


In his opinion piece, “Taxes Far More Than Necessary Evil,” Rabbi Strauss demonstrates why he should stick to his “day job” as a synagogue spiritual leader. His writing on both Halacha and tax issues is filled with misinformation and erroneous reasoning. Rabbi Strauss cites the tax to support the Mishkan as proof that taxes have been a legitimate part of Jewish life since we left Egypt. Of course, that was a poll tax that was imposed on every adult male regardless of income or wealth. He goes on to immediately say that Jewish sources tell us that there is an obligation to provide universal education and health care for the poor – using taxes to finance it. His Jewish sources must be liberal Jewish editorial writers since the Torah requires only supporting Torah education rather than general education – and only in cases where the family is unable to afford it. According to our tradition, parents have the the primary responsibility for educating their children and teaching them a trade. Does anyone remember the story of Hillel peeking into a Torah study session from outside and getting sick from exposure to the elements because he could not afford the admission fee to the session? He was then admitted for free, but the “tradition” was that people should pay for even their own Torah education except in cases of financial need. Even Hillel did not demand admission to the lecture as an entitlement. In fact, the amount our tradition says should be allocated to support the poor is 10% of income, and the sages recommended limiting contributions to 20% of income to avoid having the donor become impoverished. If there were additional “needs,” they would not be funded. There is no open ended requirement to support limitless needs of others.


Further, regarding the issues of education funding and taxation, there are other inaccuracies. Arizona has two funds for education: Capital and Operating. When comparing spending to other states to get a rank of 48 in spending, the Capital spending is excluded. When that is added back in, Arizona is ranked 24. Also, student enrollment has increased about 10.7% over the past 4 years. In the same period, state funding for education increased 40%, the number of school administrators increased 17.9%, managers increased 27.6%, total superintendent salaries increased 49%, number of teachers increased 13.7%, and average teacher salaries increased 16.5% to $49,331. In addition, during that time, school districts, while complaining about a shortage of money, have, since 2003, been increasing their cash reserves by $1 billion to $2.3 billion as of June 2008. This information is from Arizona Department of Education reports. Arizona taxpayers do not need to be further burdened with taxes to support bureaucratic empires built within the state's school districts. Arizona's students need the money to be spent wisely on educating students rather than supporting bureaucrats and building up their slush funds.


Regarding the tuition scholarship tax credit, those credits actually save the state money by shifting students from public schools where the cost per pupil to government is at least $8500 per year to private schools at a cost to taxpayers far less than that.


More taxation is not the answer. Higher taxes drive away productive people and businesses that support our communities. We need more freedom and less government to improve education and to foster economic growth that will make everyone better off.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

CPS Reform Proposal

CPS Reform Proposal Purpose: Improvement in accountability and cost effectiveness of CPS for the benefit of the public is the primary goal of this proposal. It seeks to allow this by privatizing the management of the CPS functions and allowing direct voter input for selecting the amount of services that will be provided by each contracting organization. By requiring voters to vote for percentages of business to go to each contractor, better contractor performance will result in more state business going to the superior contractors. By requiring each voter to vote for at least two contractors, we still ensure that other contractors will be in place to provide cost and quality competition. Time Frames: CPS will contract all routine case management work to 3-5 qualified independent organizations on a bi-annual basis corresponding to the election cycle for state legislators. Investigation work will also be contracted out to 3-5 qualified independent organizations on a bi-annual basis. ...

I'm Back!

I took a break from political blogging because I was concerned that my Information Technology career would be adversely affected by my conservative and often politically incorrect views. Now that I'm retired, I'm back!

Chicago Needs Loan Sharks to Protect Citizens from City Government

This article posted by WBEZ news in Chicago illustrates how the city government is worse than criminals when it comes to financially exploiting people. The city imposed strict ordinances to add more fees and more automated speed camera; the city then let tow truck companies loose on violators. How do you think Chicago city officials would respond to a private company doing similar things in a business context in Chicago without city backing? The article shows an example of how $360 in civil violations increases to $820 in just one day and becomes $1595 in 21 days.  Plus, you will lose your vehicle after 21 days. Keep in mind that the proceeds of the vehicle sale just go to the city and are NOT applied to fines, the auto loan, or anything else except the city treasury. Typically, the towing companies buy the cars for a very low "scrap" price that is well below market value. This compounds the evil by taking what could be city money gotten by evil means and putting it in t...