Skip to main content

Enforce Georgia’s Election Laws in Senate Run-off Elections

There has been a lot of talk about people moving to Georgia to vote in the run-off election for the two US Senate races. Leftists are urging people to move to Georgia, register to vote there, cast votes for the Democrats, and then move back home. Republicans have been wringingtheir hands over this and contemplating whether they should fight fire with fire and consider doing the same thing even though it is illegal. While I am pleased that some Republicans are willing to fight hard against Democrat election stealing, most are simply wringing their hands in ignorance.

The Georgia Secretary of State, Brad Raffensperger, has already suspended voter registration until after the run-off election for people moving into the state. I learned this by calling the Election Department of the Georgia Secretary of State Office. This should mostly take care of the problem of out of state voters moving in to affect the results of the run-off election.

However, Georgia law only allows people registered to vote in the original election to vote in the run-off election. This means that any newly registered voters, even if they resided in Georgia before the November 3 election, should not be allowed to vote in the run-off if they were not registered on November 3. It is not clear that the law is being followed to allow only voters legally entitled to vote to cast ballots. Voter registration for Georgia residents who resided there before November 3 has not been suspended.

This is important for two reasons. First, the law should be followed regarding the election to promote a fair outcome under rule of law. Intuitively, it is not fair or reasonable for people not eligible to vote in the original election to vote in the run-off because the run-off is a continuation of the election process started on November 3 and not a separate election. In fact, it would be even more reasonable to only allow registered voters who actually voted on November 3 to participate in the run-off election, but that is not the law.

There is a second reason for not allowing any voters unregistered on November 3 to vote in the run-off. It is too easy to for people to fraudulently claim they were residents of Georgia in October in order to cast illegal ballots in the run-off. Unscrupulous Democrats would have no trouble forging rental contracts, utility bills, and other documents establishing residency as of October. Under the law, these people would not be allowed to vote in the run-off anyway because they were not registered voters on November 3. However, it is critical that the law be followed. It is not clear that the Georgia Secretary of State will be permitting only those registered on November 3 to vote in the run-off. I am awaiting a call to clarify their policy.

It is critical that Georgia’s voter lists include only legal voters for the run-off election. Close scrutiny by poll watchers will be required to prevent fraud. In addition, careful scrutiny will have to be made of all voters, in person and especially by mail, to determine that the person voting is actually the registered voter. Anyone voting in the run-off who did not vote in the November 3 election should be subjected to special scrutiny because of greater potential for election fraud.

Georgia’s political leaders and Republican Party leaders need to ensure that this election is done according to the law, and that strict standards of voter identification are met.

.......................................................

Georgia Statute: § 21-2-501. Number of votes required for election

A provision of this statute specifies that only people who were registered to vote in the original election are allowed to vote in the run-off election. It is critical that this law be followed. Anyone registering after the original election is not allowed to vote in the run-off. Georgia state government officials and the Republican Party need to ensure that no recently registered voters (after the original election) are allowed to vote in the run-off. Poll watchers need to be prepared to challenge the eligibility of voters on these grounds.

(10) The run-off primary, special primary runoff, run-off election, or special election runoff shall be a continuation of the primary, special primary, election, or special election for the particular office concerned. Only the electors who were duly registered to vote and not subsequently deemed disqualified to vote in the primary, special primary, election, or special election for candidates for that particular office shall be entitled to vote therein, and only those votes cast for the persons designated as candidates in such run-off primary, special primary runoff, run-off election, or special election runoff shall be counted in the tabulation and canvass of the votes cast. No elector shall vote in a run-off primary or special primary runoff in violation of Code Section 21-2-224.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

TSA Employees Finally Getting Paid What They are Worth

The government shutdown has caused TSA employees to not get paid. Considering that they provide negative overall value to the nation and travelers, they are still technically getting over paid. However, getting them to pay travelers is not feasible. They generally provide very little protection for the inconvenience and humiliation they inflict on travelers. The real security in an airplane cabin is a secure cockpit and passengers who will fight hijackers to the death now that we know what they are up to. I'm also still waiting to hear a good explanation of why banning pocket knives from aircraft and other great TSA ideas enhances our security. Basic TSA-Pre screening without those ridiculously expensive scanners (also known as what was done before 9-11) is also perfectly adequate. The Huffington Post has a whiny article about the TSA employees not getting paid. Of course, all government employees including those not actually showing up for work will get back pay once the approp

Turn the Tables on Biden in the Debate

 In the Presidential Debate tonight, President Trump should turn the tables on Joe Biden.  Do you remember the ridiculous question in the first debate asking Trump to denounce White Supremacy groups as if there were any doubt on his position? Trump has denounced them consistently and clearly. In fact, the question should have been directed at Joe Biden who has worked closely with KKK leader Robert Byrd in the Senate as well as other White Supremacists and regularly uses bigoted language. Trump, when he inevitably gets a question like that should not even answer it. Instead, he should point to his consistent record against racism, admonish the moderator for being sloppy by not referencing those statements, and tell the moderator he should be asking Joe Biden that question. Mention Joe Biden’s friendships with KKK and other racist senators. Reference Joe’s language such as “whether you are poor or white” and “there is little diversity in the black community” with respect to culture and

Arizonans are Taxed Enough

This is a response to this opinion piece in the Jewish News of Greater Phoenix. In his opinion piece, “Taxes Far More Than Necessary Evil,” Rabbi Strauss demonstrates why he should stick to his “day job” as a synagogue spiritual leader. His writing on both Halacha and tax issues is filled with misinformation and erroneous reasoning. Rabbi Strauss cites the tax to support the Mishkan as proof that taxes have been a legitimate part of Jewish life since we left Egypt. Of course, that was a poll tax that was imposed on every adult male regardless of income or wealth. He goes on to immediately say that Jewish sources tell us that there is an obligation to provide universal education and health care for the poor – using taxes to finance it. His Jewish sources must be liberal Jewish editorial writers since the Torah requires only supporting Torah education rather than general education – and only in cases where the family is unable to afford it. According to our tradition, parents have